RSS Feed MEI Podcast

The Iraqi Refugee Crisis: Humanitarian and Political Implications

 
Event Summary
The Iraqi Refugee Crisis: Humanitarian and Political Implications
July 02, 2007

Event Featuring:

Nir Rosen, Ken Bacon, Ambassador Wendy Chamberlin

Overview

The three panelists stressed the magnitude of the humanitarian crisis facing Iraqi refugees and its destabilizing threat to Iraq's neighbors. Instead of refugee camps, the Iraqis-in-exile have resettled in the urban centers of the Middle East, making this refugee crisis uniquely difficult to address. The speakers criticized the United States for its insufficient efforts to alleviate the suffering of Iraqi refugees, and outlined realistic approaches that Washington should take to improve the lives of the Iraqis.

Event Summary

Ambassador Wendy Chamberlain opened the discussion by providing context to the refugee crisis plaguing Iraq and its neighbors. About 1.2 million Iraqi refugees are currently residing in Syria, while another 750,000 are displaced in Jordan. About 54,000 and 40,000 have found refuge in Iran and Lebanon, respectively. In addition to the refugees escaping Iraq, roughly 1.7 million have become Internally Displaced People (IDPs) after fleeing their homes for safety elsewhere within the country.

Nir Rosen began his remarks by highlighting the parallels between Palestinian and Iraqi refugees. In his view, Iraqis have become the “new Palestinians,” also threatening to destabilize the Middle East. He noted that Ba‘thists and former regime members fearing reprisals for their association with Saddam Hussayn generated the first wave of refugees. However, not until the outbreak of civil war in 2005 did a mass exodus and genuine humanitarian crisis erupt. Fearing Shi‘a militias tied to the Iraqi government and unable to find refuge in the Shi‘a south, hordes of Sunnis fled their homes for safe haven. Describing the economic and social hardships that Iraqi refugees endure, Mr. Rosen explained that most fleeing Iraqis were forced to sell their possessions in order to secure their financial wellbeing. Due to the high price of private schooling, child refugees residing in Jordan typically do not attend school, and many of their parents can only find jobs on the black market. Relative to Iraq’s other neighbors, Syria has been quite generous toward the displaced Iraqis, offering them the same health care and free schooling afforded to Syrian citizens. However, the refugees’ resettlement in Damascus has spurred a spike in crime and prostitution.

Ken Bacon offered several explanations as to why the Iraqi refugee crisis has received underwhelming media attention. Above all, the American military’s efforts to pacify Iraq have dominated the headlines. In contrast to the humanitarian emergency in Darfur, the displaced Iraqis are not resettled in refugee camps and instead have blended into the urban centers of Iraq’s neighbors, such as ‘Amman and Damascus. Mr. Bacon described the United States’ response to the crisis as “pathetic,” citing the political difficulty for American policymakers to acknowledge the negative repercussions of the war in Iraq. Furthermore, security concerns have prevented the United States from resettling large numbers of Iraqis within its borders. Hoping to resettle 7,000 Iraqis by the end of the current fiscal year, the US has until now only admitted a meager 130 refugees.

Mr. Bacon also outlined how the United States can effectively address the humanitarian crisis in the heart of the Middle East. While working toward a peaceful and stable Iraq that will eventually welcome the refugees home, Washington simultaneously should financially support the host countries that have born the burden of the crisis. Iraqi refugees account for 14% of Jordan’s population — equivalent to an influx of 45 million people into the United States. With only a small minority of Iraqi child refugees attending classes in Jordan, according to Mr. Bacon, the United States should pump money into ‘Amman so as to enable more displaced Iraqis to receive an education.

After offering their initial remarks, the three panelists took questions from the audience. Responding to a question about advocacy efforts to bolster American support for Iraqi refugees, Mr. Rosen pessimistically stated that the United States was “sick” of Iraq and has begun to blame the Iraqis for the chaos enveloping their country. Later, Mr. Bacon explained that “denial and indifference” have contributed to insufficient resettlement efforts in the United States. Unlike at the end of the Vietnam War, the United States has not admitted defeat in Iraq. Washington considers the refugees as simply temporary and thus not requiring resettlement inside the United States.

About this Event

Nir Rosen, Ken Bacon and Ambassador Wendy Chamberlain offered these remarks in the Middle East Institute's Boardman Room in Washington, DC on July 2, 2007.

Speaker Details

Nir Rosen is currently a Fellow at the New American Foundation. Prior to that post, he spent more than two years in Iraq reporting on the American occupation, the relationship between Americans and Iraqis, interethnic and sectarian relations, and the Iraqi civil war. Ken Bacon is the President of Refugees International. Prior to that, he served as Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs for six years and was a reporter, editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal in Washington, DC. Ambassador Wendy Chamberlain is the President of the Middle East Institute. Prior to holding that position, she served as Deputy High Commissioner for the UN High Commissioner for Refugees and as Assistant Administrator of the Asia/Near East Division of USAID.

Attributions

Daniel Belkin, a rising senior and history major at Dartmouth College and current intern in MEI's Publications Department, wrote this event summary. This summary was peer-edited by Communications intern Eric Lukas, a rising junior at Columbia University, where he is majoring in history.

Disclaimer: Assertions and opinions in this Summary are solely those of the above-mentioned author(s) and do not reflect necessarily the views of the Middle East Institute, which expressly does not take positions on Middle East policy.